how about co-dependable muscles?
Thanks for that tip decu68, is very useful. However, it creates a question for me.
I am new to the scene and the forum, and of course inexperienced. I consider my question quite complicated, and I am not sure how to best state it. For that, I apologise if it sounds irrational or doesn't make sense. In that case, please feel free to ask me for more details.
My question:
Does this:
Quote:
Originally Posted by
decu68
ALWAYS work the larger muscles first. By working the smaller muscles you are depleting them and therefore will not be able to give the full attention to the larger muscles they deserve; thus shorting yourself.
apply also with co-dependable muscles?
For example, in one of my workout days I work all my legs' muscles –or at least I try-. I start from bottom to top (which happens to be from smaller to bigger), first Calves, then Hamstrings, and lastly Quads. And that is because I can isolate each muscle, and work with them without clogging the other two.
To my understanding, The further a muscle is located from the main body, the more dependable is to the muscles that are preceding it and closer to the core.
In practice: Calves are depended both on Hamstrings and Quads, Hamstrings are depended more on Quads, and lastly Quads, can operate even without the other two.
From my understanding, if, I start train from bigger to smaller, Quads-Hamstrings-Calves, Quads are going to be worked much more than the other two -especially the Calves-, and at the time I will work the Calves, the other two parts will be consequently exhausted and weaker, and thus my workout will be less effective.
Thanks for reading it, and I hope it makes sense
Yanes