Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 22

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Member bme4363's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    WEST VIRGINIA
    Posts
    10

    Walmart protein vs ON gold standard protein?

    I have been using the body fortress protein from Walmart. It tastes really good and mixes alright. I have been thinking about switching to ON gold standard. Do you think it would be worth the extra cash or is protein just protein? Should I expect better gains from the more expensive proteins and maybe a little less body fat? Just looking for opinions or even better protein options. Thank you.

  2. #2
    Senior Member rickdennis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    116
    depends what time of the day you are using protein powders.

    THe most optimal protein to date is hydrolyzed, with regards to peri-workout protein shakes. It ensures the quickest delivery of nutrients and less fillers (it's more expensive). YOu wouldn't need too much either, 30g should be plenty per shake. Def worth investing (dymatize hydrosylates, VPX N.O. Synthesize, ON Platinum Hydro)

    As far as ON goes, they have always given me gas and stuff so i personally avoid, but i think they use less fillers than other companies out there. My BB coach actually lab-tested a lot of these popular brands, he swears by ON Pro-Complex so i'm sure it's one of the best. Body Fortress most likely isn't too great... obviously cost-effective, and better than not having ANYTHING at all.

    hope this helps a little.

  3. #3
    Experienced Member bryntevans01's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Manchester, UK
    Posts
    81
    Just to throw a massive spanner of confusion into the works.... When you look at ingredients, it's really important to look at the amino blends as to where in the ingredients qty list they are. The cheap brand labels this as 'super recovery blend'. They are all amino acids, which means that when this product is lab tested it comes out as 30g Protein per scoop. Now, that is true that it has 30g of protein but a massive amount of that is amino acids mix which means that you are essentially feeding your muscles with probably about 15g protein (whey). It's well known as 'Spiking'. I am certainly not saying that amino acid mix in shakes are bad, I'm saying that for them to be that high in the list is a little bit sneaky because it's being filed out. You can google protein spiking if you don't believe me ;-)

    So for example if you need 100g protein extra from your shakes, you need 4 shakes of 'ON Whey' 4x30g protein. But if you use the cheaper brand, you will need (presuming a 15g pro) you need 6 shakes 6x42g. Do you see where I am going with this? Even though it's more expensive for the better brand, it's worth it for more value, yield, taste and results.

  4. #4
    Experienced Member bryntevans01's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Manchester, UK
    Posts
    81
    [url]http://3fu3l.com/the-protein-spiking-scam/[/url]

  5. #5
    Member bme4363's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    WEST VIRGINIA
    Posts
    10
    Quote Originally Posted by bryntevans01 View Post
    [url]http://3fu3l.com/the-protein-spiking-scam/[/url]
    I'm sorry I didn't see your posts while I was writing my last reply. That makes a lot of sense to why it may be so cheap. What brand protein do you recommend?

  6. #6
    Experienced Member bryntevans01's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Manchester, UK
    Posts
    81
    Oh, and that 'Glycine' you see as an amino acid. It is of no use to the human body, it is not a BCAA and not essential to our bodies. Just to be more specific.

  7. #7
    Member bme4363's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    WEST VIRGINIA
    Posts
    10
    Body fortress is 7.50 a pound and ON gold standard is about 11.00 a pound. I can't see a huge difference between the labels. The extra calories and fat could be adjusted for in my daily macros. The body fortress has six more grams of protein per scoop and it has whey isolate in the ingredients. I might try one of the others that you have recommended that are not so pricey just to experiment and see if it's worth the extra money. Because I too like to make sure I'm getting the most out of my money. Thank you both.

  8. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by bme4363 View Post
    Body fortress is 7.50 a pound and ON gold standard is about 11.00 a pound. I can't see a huge difference between the labels. The extra calories and fat could be adjusted for in my daily macros. The body fortress has six more grams of protein per scoop and it has whey isolate in the ingredients. I might try one of the others that you have recommended that are not so pricey just to experiment and see if it's worth the extra money. Because I too like to make sure I'm getting the most out of my money. Thank you both.
    There are various different factors that are in play when you are trying to determine the real price of a product but so far the best for me has been to divide the grams of protein per serving by the serving size itself.

    for example:

    Body Fortress: 30g/protein per serving divided by 42g serving size is 71% of protein content which means that you are getting 0.71lb of protein for the $7.50 that you mentioned

    ON: 24g/protein per serving divided by 30.4g serving size is 79% of protein content which means that you are getting 0.79lb of protein for the $11 that you mentioned.

    All of that is too much too keep up with so I just buy unflavored protein. That way I know what I'm paying for - protein powder, not flavoring ingredients.

    I would recommend you go with one of those brands. And you get to flavor them any way you want to each time you take it.
    And I don't know why all of the hype about isolate powders, they don't provide any significant advantages to regular whey. Unless you have issues with high cholesterol (which you shouldn't if you are working out) it's not good ROI.

    Here are the brands that my personal trainer recommends:

    Jarrow: [url]http://www.amazon.com/Jarrow-Form...unflavored[/url]
    GNC: [url]http://www.gnc.com/GNC-Pro-Perfor...d=13164543[/url]
    TGS Nutrition: [url]http://www.tgsnutrition.com/products/whey[/url]

  9. #9
    Experienced Member bryntevans01's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Manchester, UK
    Posts
    81
    I personally use USN. ON are a great brand, muscle pharm, CNP it's all to do with research really, depends on what you want and how you tend to eat generally. I use USN GF-1 because it's 40g pro, low fat, low carb, which leaves me pretty much flexible with my carbs and fats for my normal diet. Get online and research properly, use the forums and ask otherwise you'll be throwing your money away. Remember that supplements can never replace proper nutrition.

  10. #10
    Senior Senior JEFIT Member is304's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    208
    There are a couple of companies that have what they call "full disclosure label" - where they put in exactly how much of each ingredient is in the blend. I always try to pick those - this way I know exactly what I use.

    Just the other day I looked at an NO-booster with "proprietary blend". It had all the right ingredients - AAKG, taurine, L-arginine, beta-alanine and four or five others. The problem - their serving is 5g, and they don't put in the proportion. The effective dose is at least 2g for taurine, 2g for alanine, 1-2g for AAKG. Of course, I could take 2-3 doses at once, but how would I know that I won't get an overdose of glutamine (the cheapest ingredient, which I already get from my proteins) and will get enough AAKG (which is more expensive, but is an actual NO booster)? I put the blend right back on the shelf - to wait for another sucker.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •